Now you've got me playing, and yes - I agree some people who are playing are not good. One of them could only suggest "animal" when presented with a tortoise... (Not to mention the person who suggested "spider" for a scarab beetle...)
I just got 1660 with someone. We hit the same wavelength ("Yay hot girls!") and got a lot of nudes. If in doubt, playing "hot" and "sexy" tends to work.
My trouble is I haven't a clue who 90% of American celebrities are!
According to the high scores table, some people actually manage ridiculously large scores, but I'm guessing they do that by enabling VoIP or similar so they can have real-time rapid conversation with each other, and agreeing to post bizarre and obscure tags for images, that probably actively damages Google's image-tagging abiliy. Boo.
I got someone who passed everything .. my guess is that they couldn't figure out the user interface. There are two main traps:
- it doesn't specify that it will keep you on the picture until you put in at least one term that matches with the other user, or the time runs out - or that "pass" ends your run - or that you can't enter all your keywords on one line (this one got me for the first few goes!)
Have they improved the login process? I tried this, ooh, a year a go maybe, and 3/4 of the time my partner was clearly a bot. (i.e. spouting a sequence of nonsense words like "meticulously" for every picture). I don't know what people thought they were achieving by doing that.
Ok, trying this out in work was a bad idea. The first picture I got was of a naked woman. The next picture was of someone that appeared to be having sex with a human-sized scorpion. I truly have learned something new today.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
I just got 1660 with someone. We hit the same wavelength ("Yay hot girls!") and got a lot of nudes. If in doubt, playing "hot" and "sexy" tends to work.
My trouble is I haven't a clue who 90% of American celebrities are!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
My most useful skill so far has been the ability to identify American Footballers.
no subject
no subject
no subject
"Hot", "sexy", "(wo)man" are all safe guesses for some of the unsafe pictures that turn up. :-)
Does anybody know if there's a time component to the scores, i.e. do you score more for finding a matching word quicker?
no subject
no subject
What's with the people who pass everything?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
- it doesn't specify that it will keep you on the picture until you put in at least one term that matches with the other user, or the time runs out
- or that "pass" ends your run
- or that you can't enter all your keywords on one line (this one got me for the first few goes!)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I do not want to think of negative words when presented with an image of a scantily clad woman in a provocative pose.
Also, I would like the Visually Disabled persons version, please, with nice big images.
Have told 'em so.
no subject
Arminas Sregon obviously also ept!
I'm not good on celebrities (model/actress) is a good guess, but again I had some partners who failed to get some obvious ones.
Worryingly at one point I mistyped tatoo and by the time I could correct my partner had done that too!