Skip to Main Content
emperor (
emperor
) wrote
2009
-
09
-
09
03:05 pm
Entry tags:
polls
,
silly
Yes/No/Tickybox
Since SQL has not been my friend today...
[
Poll #1455301
]
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
toothycat
2009-09-09 02:09 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Should that be
True, False and File Not Found
? ;)
no subject
aardvark179.livejournal.com
2009-09-09 02:16 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Unknown
no subject
emperor
2009-09-09 02:22 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Tickybox
no subject
aardvark179.livejournal.com
2009-09-09 02:13 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I hate it when it comes to predicate optimisation, and bug reports from people who don't love it.
no subject
beckyc.livejournal.com
2009-09-09 02:40 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I boggled when I first was doing excel macros and discovered that there were the visibility options visible, hidden and very hidden.
no subject
didiusjulianus.livejournal.com
2009-09-09 04:35 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Any kind of logic is all right with me, it's things completely lacking in logic that I'm not generally so keen on :)
no subject
mhoulden.livejournal.com
2009-09-09 09:48 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Of course the only sensible answer is yes
and
no. There are many times when I've thought SQL should have a MAYBE operator to go with LIKE and SOUNDEX, but I keep wanting to
SELECT UNTO
things.
no subject
queex.livejournal.com
2009-09-11 12:22 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I meant to say- if you think SQL is bad, R uses an inconsistent ternary logic model. Witness:
> NA & TRUE
[1] NA
> tmp <- c(1,2,3,NA)
> tmp>=3
[1] FALSE FALSE TRUE NA
> tmp[tmp>=3]
[1] 3 NA
Yes, that's right, the array selection syntax treats NA as TRUE.
8 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
> NA & TRUE
[1] NA
> tmp <- c(1,2,3,NA)
> tmp>=3
[1] FALSE FALSE TRUE NA
> tmp[tmp>=3]
[1] 3 NA
Yes, that's right, the array selection syntax treats NA as TRUE.