posted by [identity profile] robert-jones.livejournal.com at 04:00pm on 07/07/2010
I've not been following closely, but I believe that the reason the government lost previously when they tried to change the terms of civil servants redunancy pay, is because the existing provisions are set out in primary legislation (the Superannuation Act 1972).

I'm not an employment lawyer, but I believe that most employment contracts do provide for the terms of employment to be varied from time to time.

Reply

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

July

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
    1
 
2
 
3 4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9 10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31