Matthew's Journal

Err, the test happens completely seperately to the vote. You earn your right to vote, and then you can go off and vote on a piece of paper just as you always did.

And I'm not arguing against the engaged right-wingers. I'm probably arguing most about the people who think New-Labour are Labour, but I wasn't arguing anything in specific. I'm arguing against the people who don't have a clue what they're voting for. The "I don't know anything about their policies, but the Sun said..." or the "my husband always told me to vote for.." etc etc etc. I don't care if people disagree with me politically. But I do want them to know what they're doing, and to vote for the party they actually "agree with"/"think they're voting for".

I think we (and me and Emp) just fundamentally disagree. I think that letting people who don't have a clue and just randomly tick boxes based on 30 year old information is bad for the country, and devalues the idea of democracy and the vote, and you think that everyone should be able to vote easilly, regardless of whether or not they have a clue what they're voting for.

And yes, this was just a mad idea I jotted down in a comment at 8am in the morning, and of course I'd never want it implimented in practise because giving the government that sort of power is a Bad Thing. But I honestly think people who don't know anything about what they're voting for shouldn't go out and randomly tick boxes that affect everyone.