...does what it says on the tin. cabal.journals : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|||
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25 |
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
Re: A response from the cabalist
I'm not sure why I would want to post my journal in an entirely public medium and indeed I think that 'friends only' is one of the best features of LJ - I clearly don't want the *whole world* to know about my sexlife or the address of my house but I might want to tell the people I actually know about these things.
I'm presuming that the idea of cabal.journals is so that everything is 'public' (fsvo public, I know that I don't know most of the users of cabal for instance and would treat them as public) and no-one can go back and delete or edit postings. I personally don't delete stuff (except for multiple posting, grrr interface) and I only edit for grammar or f***ed up html...
If I were using cabal.journals I probably wouldn't say a lot of the things that I do say on LJ. I would say *even less* if it were actually public and searchable by, say, parents because there are people (parents) I do not wish to read everything I write.
I can view LJ like 'talking to my mates at the pub', I would view a public newsgroup as roughly equivalent to publishing in the tabloid press. I want a forum for 'talking to my mates' not one for being the tabloid press. If I wanted to be a columnist then I could do that on LJ or I could get some other form of blog, or I could use a newsgroup... where ever I thought my audience was, but that is not my intention (and never will be, I can't write essays).
Yes, I could use email for the purpose of talking to my mates but I wouldn't meet anyone new that way and further there would be more of a 'I am sending you this and want *you* to resond/help/etc' than a 'here is something that I will let you read, do what you like' feel to it. Besides, threaded comments are much better than email responses.