(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] mtbc100.livejournal.com at 01:18pm on 01/10/2006
I can't quite see the problem with it TBH. Could you elaborate?
[parent entry] [link] [reply]
ext_8103: (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com at 02:58pm on 01/10/2006
"Strongly recommends that all non-programmatic works distribute the form that the copyright holder or upstream developer would actually use for modification" is grammatical but doesn't make sense - it should be something like "works are distributed in the form".
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] mtbc100.livejournal.com at 04:37pm on 01/10/2006
Ah, thank you very much, yes. I was wondering what form they were talking about. (-:
[link] [parent] [reply]

October

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1
 
 2
 
 3
 
 4
 
5
 
 6
 
 7
 
 8
 
 9
 
 10
 
 11
 
12
 
 13
 
 14
 
 15
 
 16
 
 17
 
 18
 
19
 
 20
 
 21
 
 22
 
 23
 
 24
 
 25
1
26
 
 27
 
 28
 
 29
 
 30
 
 31