...does what it says on the tin. Law and morality and religion : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|||
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25 |
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
(no subject)
That's a large part of why I think religion and law need to be kept far, far away from each other. Religions involve their own sets of religious law which may or may not be analagous or even appropriate in a changing society, particularly one including a number of religions and thus inevitably conflicting religious beliefs. Granted, my own foremost reliegious belief is centered upon respect for others' beliefs, so that's something of a self-fulfilling prophesy and thus hypocritical.
But also religious laws (being connected to faith) should, in my opinion, be a matter of personal choice and testing, kept between one and one's God and not punishable by earthly officials. If they also are illegal for other reasons as well (see above), so be it, but they shouldn't become illegal solely because they are immoral by the tenets of one's religion.
I'm not sure I'm putting any of this well.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Morality is meaningless without choice. The ability to do "exactly what they want" might follow upon the insurance of the freedom to choose, but it also might not, but ensuring the freedom to choose is what's important. From the perspective of the law, ensuring that your choices will not infringe upon another's ability to make their own choices. From the perspective of religion, ensuring that you choose to be moral because you're following God's guidelines, and not because of physical threats imposed by society.
I'm still not putting this well, or at least nto completely. Bah.
(no subject)
Thankyou, that's roughly what I wanted to express and failed.
(no subject)
Your saying you agree with my answer to
(no subject)