posted by
emperor at 04:30pm on 06/12/2006 under fire and motion
This article really does describe the way I seem to work. I feel rather bad admitting that (which might be why it's on this blog...).
...does what it says on the tin. Inertia.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|||
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25 |
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(She said, hitting reload on LJ. ;-)
But getting started is always the hardest bit. Do you read
NB I'm not arguing that people should be Doing Work from 9-5 if they don't have to -- and you're probably giving your employers better value for your salary if you're doing good work for 5 hours a day or even 2 hours a day than if you're sitting at your desk doing nothing & feeling miserable and resentful for 8 hours a day. But if you have to be in work from 9-5 anyway then there are usually some minor productive things to be done with the time even if you're not feeling inspired to do Great Things.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
My optimum working hours seem to be just slightly more than I'd choose to work if I could choose completely...
(no subject)
It describes me quite well, though I think I have longer periods of either in or out of the zone. I'm a bit out of the zone at the moment having drawn lots of blanks trying to sort out various problems with insufficient information and insufficient resources. :-(
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)