emperor: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 11:15am on 21/07/2007 under ,
I try and avoid grumbling about the NHS - I'm generally of the view that it makes a BALGE effort at a difficult job. It has annoyed me today, though.

I need a referral to a hospital for some diagnostic work. My GP tells me some paperwork will come through the post, and that I might as well go to the local University hospital. Today, said paperwork arrives. It has an appointment number and a "password", as well as my 3 "choices" of clinic, and a website where I can get "information to help you make your choice of alternative".

The website doesn't work - it refuses point blank to talk to my web-browser. Surely we learned in about 1997 that you offer people something, if necessary with a caveat "this might not look so pretty". So,I try the NHS website proper. That will at least show me the location of my three choices (the paperwork conveniently fails to tell me where the George Eliot Hospital is); much of the other useful data is "not available yet". No-where can I find out anything I might want to know like: who the specialist is, what their post-op complication rates are, what the waiting time's like, what's the food like, etc., etc.

So, I make my Hobson's choice, and call the University Hospital. I wait for 3 or 4 minutes while the person apologises for "the new systems a bit slow", having taking all my details again (surely the referral must have told them where I live???). The first they can do me is 5th September - a fair way off, but *shrug*, it's nothing urgent. The first couple of weeks in September, though, [livejournal.com profile] atreic and I are planning on being away, so I ask if I could have something a little later. "Well, I can only offer you dates up to the 7th of September. If you want something later than that, you'll have to make an appointment now, and re-book it later".

WTF? In what way is this a sensible system? I'd rather they'd spent less money on the illusion of choice and instead had an appointment-booking system that's fit for purpose. As it is, I'm going to get through a load of mostly-useless paperwork, have to make another appointment later, and then presumably get the same paperwork a second time.
Mood:: 'pissed off' pissed off
There are 7 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] james-r.livejournal.com at 12:22pm on 21/07/2007
If you want something later than that, you'll have to make an appointment now, and re-book it later".

WTF? In what way is this a sensible system?


I believe it's because they have to offer you something within twelve weeks, and the rebooking later can be done a few seconds after they book the appointment for the 5th which you have no intention of taking.
emperor: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 12:39pm on 21/07/2007
I was told I'd have to wait for the paperwork to come through.
 
posted by [identity profile] james-r.livejournal.com at 12:45pm on 21/07/2007
Ah, not as efficient as addenbrookes then :/
 
posted by [identity profile] mtbc100.livejournal.com at 01:33pm on 21/07/2007
You should write a letter of complaint to somebody outlining all the above. It's ridiculous and someone needs to poke someone to do something about it.
 
posted by [identity profile] wellinghall.livejournal.com at 03:51pm on 21/07/2007
Having been through the same thing myself for my eyes, you have my sympathies.
 
posted by [identity profile] romancinger.livejournal.com at 11:56am on 22/07/2007
I'm sure when my business was being set up, I had 5 choices. George Eliot is I think Leamington Spa. If Leicester Royal Infirmary is an option (and it was for me) I can recommend it, and waiting times are short - at least they were for my department. Though sending the paperwork is less speedy.

I found I could access general information about the hospitals (waiting times, death rates(!)) but not things like food. You are supposed to be able to get info on a consultant, but this doesn't seem to cover anything other than their CV.
 

PS

posted by [identity profile] romancinger.livejournal.com at 11:58am on 22/07/2007
Sorry, not Leamington, Nuneaton.

October

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31