I surprised my colleagues by exclaiming "Gordon Bennett" the other day (I forget about what now); I think "fucking hell" would have elicited less of a response. Whilst playing Robo Rally,
sain_bano exclaimed "Oh Shit!" when her robot was shoved by another robot, and then looked very embarrassed (I think because L was present).
atreic's parents consider the word "knackered" to be swearing (I consider it entirely polite, so have caused offense a few times by carelessly using it in conversation).
I seem to have a fairly inconsistent view on swearing. I don't generally use the word "fuck" in speech, but was entertained by the fucking short version of Pulp Fiction, and seem to mind using it in type less. I seem to think "bollocks", "shit", and "crap" are more mild, and sometimes forget that they aren't always appropriate (whoops!).
Anyhow, I found this article interesting and entertaining, especially the bit about the Stroop effect. [I think that link is WS, despite its use of swear-words. YMMV]
I seem to have a fairly inconsistent view on swearing. I don't generally use the word "fuck" in speech, but was entertained by the fucking short version of Pulp Fiction, and seem to mind using it in type less. I seem to think "bollocks", "shit", and "crap" are more mild, and sometimes forget that they aren't always appropriate (whoops!).
Anyhow, I found this article interesting and entertaining, especially the bit about the Stroop effect. [I think that link is WS, despite its use of swear-words. YMMV]
(no subject)
I saw that article via
I don't believe in words that must never be used; words are there to be used, however infrequently.
As I noted to
…more than in:
[Swear words fictionalised to keep comment unequivocally work-safe.] The Stroop effect seems to be a problem for me only when the meaning of the words contradicts what I'm trying to determine about them, not when their meaning is in some sense shocking.
Also, I regard farting and spitting as more objectionable than defecation, urination or nasal mucus. This doesn't stop me regarding defecatory and urinary swearing as moderate-to-strong.
I once met someone who claimed that "bloody" was blasphemy and referred to the blood of Christ on the cross; I think he was talking cobblers. "Gordon Bennett", on the other hand, really might be a euphemism for a blasphemy.
(no subject)
(no subject)
For example "berk", which seems to be regarded as a fairly mild insult meaning "a bit of an idiot" is an abbreviation of "Berkeley Hunt", which is itself Cockney rhyming slang for the 'c' word. Not so polite after all — though there seems to be little rationality to what offends whom when it comes to swearing.
(Incidentally, I accidentally let the 'f' word slip through, up there. I hope I'm excused?)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
"Gorblimey" is from "God blind me".
See Larry Niven's stories for the future use of "censored" and "bleep" as swear words.
(no subject)
...supposed by mistaken people. There's no etymological support for this at all - it's simply an adjective derived from "blood".
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I seem to think "bollocks", "shit", and "crap" are more mild, and sometimes forget that they aren't always appropriate
Interesting - do you consider those three equally strong? I say "crap" all the time and barely consider it swearing, but tend to avoid the other two. I guess I need to be more mindful of people's differing swear word hierarchies. I probably offend some people unwittingly by saying "crap".
(no subject)
I think "shit" is stronger than "bollocks" or "crap", but not vastly so.
(no subject)
I hope I'm not offending people, but since I seem to be more mealy-mouthed than most of most acquaintances I think it unlikely. (Some of my colleagues actually used to apologise for swearing in front of me, even though I never consciously complained or even reacted.)
(no subject)
Hm. "Knackered" certainly *sounds* naughty, and if you think of it as slaughtering, might be a bit squeamish, but surely is entirely acceptable. Come to think of it "knackers" is also slang for "balls", and sounds a bit like "knickers" and "knockers", might that be where the crude associations come from?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
So later on, when I had a one-on-one lesson with another teacher, I asked him whether he thought knackered was swearing, and he said it was generally accepted that it was. At the time I didn't swear at all, and so decided not to say it any more. But since then I took it up again (there just isn't a better way of describing how tired you are!), of course, though I swear quite rarely even now :)
One of my favourite expressions (and what I'll say if something goes wrong unexpectedly but isn't the end of the world) is "Oh bog!", which people seem to find amusing. But in my defence, I heard somewhere that bog is the Albanian (vel sim.) word for God, so really I'm just blaspheming :)
(no subject)
(no subject)
My mum works with computers in a primary school. I think she has a non-offensive word which starts the same way for every offensive word. So, is it rude to say e.g. 'sugar' and 'crumbs', if it is obvious what you mean, or is it sufficiently removed to lack any effect (and to not be obvious for children)? Equally, is it rude to print s**t or f**k - surely it has the same associations?