...does what it says on the tin. Lon:NRK : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|||
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25 |
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
(no subject)
The Government did intervene, though, and the cited reason was that Northern Rock's mess was threatening to destabilise the entire UK banking industry. If that's true then I think it's reasonable for the UK, its Government and taxpayers to hold it against Northern Rock, its management and its shareholders, who ought to suffer some penalty. While exacting a suitable penalty might entail overriding rights they thought they had, I don't think it's actually unfair.