...does what it says on the tin. LJ becoming evil? : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|||
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25 |
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
(no subject)
[Also, Web adverts generally are a dubious proposition - as Nielsen observes, users are generally completely oblivious to them, to the point that a classic UI mistake is to make a UI element look like a banner ad.
Also, LJ said "no ads, ever", and it is distressing that the new owners do not plan to honour what was left of that promise.
Also, the spin is ridiculous, and new-LJ should at the very least be willing to tell the truth.]
(no subject)
If users were oblivious to the ads would they complain so much about them?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
If the majority were using ABP or similar we'd see more of an arms race between the junk peddlers and the anti-ad tools than there is.
(no subject)
a) probably won't know what the ads were for
and
b) may even not have noticed the presence of still-image adverts
But I don't like animated ads, because flashing boxes in the corner of my vision are distracting and make it harder to focus on the things I actually want to see/read.
I note that LJ have now come as close as marketing-speak ever does to saying "maybe we did this wrong".
(no subject)
(no subject)