...does what it says on the tin. On gossip : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|||
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25 |
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
(no subject)
If something is said at a "private party" with, say, 25 people present, the context would suggest to me that a confidence probably wasn't intended, in the absence of any contrary indication. On the other hand, if it was an intimate party, I would expect things to be treated more confidentially.
That still leaves the question of people who overhear remarks by accident (obviously intentionally eavesdropping is bad). They seem to me to be in a slightly different position from the people who are party to the conversation, who have consented to receive the confidence, either expressly or implicitly. In your example, Charlie might be a stranger to you, but very close to Bob. If what you've said was important to Bob (rather than just tittle-tattle), it seems difficult to argue that the course of moral perfection is for Charlie to keep it under his hat.
Editted to correct a couple of typos and to add that sometimes people say foolish things when they're drunk. It's probably best not to repeat such things to those not present.
(no subject)
I'm not so sure. I often find that someone's behaviour whilst drunk is a good indicator of their real character. I recall someone I was at college with who everyone else seemed to think was great but I always got the impression was a tosser. One evening whilst drunk he came out with a bigoted tirade about how women, jews and homosexuals get an advantage in the labour market. I always wished that more people had known that he was a bigoted tosser, particularly when he ran for JCR president.
(no subject)
(no subject)
I'm not actually sure that the drunkness is the key here. I have a feeling that people are (and should be allowed to be) unguarded when the port is being passed around by candlelight, and it's not quite fair to expose the things they say to examination by the light of day. Perhaps it's just romanticism on my part though.