Last year, on 23 December, I posted on facebook: "[
emperor] thinks that John Cage's 4'33" should be the internet campaign for Christmas number one next year :-)". Clearly I wasn't the only person to think this, and some people even got their act together, and are trying to make it happen. Follow the think from here to amazon, and buy the single for 49p :-)[0]
I've liked Cage's 4'33" for quite some time now, having first encountered it at the GSM where my musicianship class one year was taken by someone who was very keen on 20th century music. When I had a radio show on CUR1350, it was the one thing the programme controller forbade me from playing - silence and radio make uncomfortable bedfellows. I'm a bit sad that it only ever seems to appear as a bit of a joke, as is the author of this little article on the background to the work. Cage's work reminds me that no-where is quiet these days, even concert halls, and it's a chance to pause and be reflective.
OTOH, if people who think it's a joke get it to Number 1, I won't be complaining at all. In fact, I'll be a very happy man :-)
[0] The Christmas Number 1 this year will be the track that's number 1 this Sunday, so based on purchases made this week
I've liked Cage's 4'33" for quite some time now, having first encountered it at the GSM where my musicianship class one year was taken by someone who was very keen on 20th century music. When I had a radio show on CUR1350, it was the one thing the programme controller forbade me from playing - silence and radio make uncomfortable bedfellows. I'm a bit sad that it only ever seems to appear as a bit of a joke, as is the author of this little article on the background to the work. Cage's work reminds me that no-where is quiet these days, even concert halls, and it's a chance to pause and be reflective.
OTOH, if people who think it's a joke get it to Number 1, I won't be complaining at all. In fact, I'll be a very happy man :-)
[0] The Christmas Number 1 this year will be the track that's number 1 this Sunday, so based on purchases made this week
(no subject)
Edit: oh, and you heard about the Mike Batt lawsuit?
(no subject)
(no subject)
Details (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/2276621.stm).
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(And technically of course it's very important that it's not dead silence: it's the sound of a concert hall with the orchestra seated but not playing. It's something which occurs before and after every other piece of music, and sometimes in the middle too. In a way, every single other piece of music is just that with other sounds put on top.)
So actually the whole point of it is to make you question what music is, by presenting you with something where something that is an essential part of music -- the intro and outro to every piece of music ever -- becomes the whole thing, and all the other elements are stripped away.
Is it music? Well, that's the question Cage is asking, and the correct response is not to come down firmly on one side or the other, to say 'of course it's music!' or 'of course it isn't!', but to use the opportunity to open your eyes and think more deeply about what music is.
Can someone be said to have composed it? Well, yes. Of course it seems an obvious idea in retrospect; it seems like it would have taken no effort. But Cage was an accomplished composer, so it obviously wasn't that he was incapable of composing something with notes; but the mark of genius is to do something that no one has ever thought of, but that everyone thinks was utterly obvious. (If this seems a lot like why it's the mark of genius to be unappreciated, well, the reader may draw their conclusions).
I, too, am sad that it's usually seen as a joke. But then I keep having to deal with people who claim that free verse isn't even poetry, so my opinion of humanity can't really sink much lower.
S.
(no subject)
(no subject)
So yes, free verse is more difficult -- far too difficult for me, whose experiments into verse are very limited and have only involved filling in well-established forms like sonnets, villanelles and sestinae. I wish I had the ability to write free verse, which is why it galls me so when people claim that it's 'easy' or somehow 'cheating'.
Basically, Mr Frost is wrong -- free verse isn't playing tennis with the net down, rather it is more like tightrope walking without a safety net. And laying out the tightrope as you walk it.
S.
(no subject)
But when I said Frost was right, what I meant was this: the net serves a purpose in tennis, but not a necessary purpose. You may play tennis without a net, but you have to be very smart, very aware, and a very good player. Otherwise you won't know when you've lost. Similarly a sonnet is a form to work within; having to work outside established forms requires more skill. Ultimately, I am not good enough to write good free verse.
On the other hand, the sort of person who believes that playing tennis without a net is easier is not a good tennis player.
But I don't know whether all this is what Frost meant.
(Disclaimer: I may be wrong about the rules of tennis.)
(no subject)
S.
(no subject)
S.
(no subject)
(no subject)
Someday I intend to read Kyle Gann's book on the piece.
(no subject)
(no subject)
Your method may vary though and that is fine by me :)
(no subject)
S.
(no subject)