...does what it says on the tin. I go driving in my car, it could be a Jaguar : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|||
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25 |
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Viz:
Or did you mean the flying-buttress look? They are unconventional-looking cars, but highly likely to become a classic, IMO - or possibly already are. I like the XJ-S, and indeed considered buying one; the XJ6 is just a boring swanky repmobile. :)
It's worth remembering that the post-1991 Ford-financed ones are supposedly better, as in the article I pasted on IRC last night.
But yes, number-one caveats are petrol and maintenance costs.