emperor: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 12:16pm on 10/07/2005
Yesterday, [livejournal.com profile] rmc28 and [livejournal.com profile] fanf got married. Yay!


The day started in the mundane manner that Saturdays often do, with [livejournal.com profile] senji and I pootling off to Bar Hill to do the shopping. The day was getting quite warm, even then. We had lunch, got changed, displaced vigorously by killing aliens, and eventually made our separate ways to Trinity College.

The pre-service music went very well, I think. Ruth had told me that the register was delayed, so I started on my reserve music list, when the green light came on, forcing me to invent a cadence I could return to the tonic with in the piece I was playing fairly quickly ;). The Mussorgsky they came into went pretty well, Paul and Peter's Purcell was great, and the Canon in D went fine (despite the music trying to shut itself half-way through). The Wedding March was OK, although I think everyone had left long before I finished playing. The hymns were less good; I fluffed two of the three intros, although subsequent verses were better. I was a bit frustrated, really: whilst I didn't play badly (YMMV - one or two people were quite rude, but most generally complementary), I have played quite a bit better.

I didn't see much of the service, as the Rückpositiv rank of pipes was between me and a view, but [livejournal.com profile] rmc28 and [livejournal.com profile] fanf both looked stunning, and the bridesmaids all looked great. I thought the Mort reading was a nice touch, and Ruth's sermon was short but to the point. Afterwards, we went outside, and there were many many bubbles (Trinity frown on confetti). We stood on the grass (I've not done that in a while) in some pretty hot sunshine, and there were photos and meeting people. Particularly suprising was discovering that Collette (who I just about managed to recognise) was married to Anton Altaparmakov, who works in Unix Support here. She was a vet in my year, who did the same part II option as me, and then went off to PhD (and have babies). She looked great.

I wandered off to the Carlton for a beer that I really needed by this point in proceedings, and was later joined by [livejournal.com profile] sesquipedality, [livejournal.com profile] antinomy, [livejournal.com profile] ptc24, [livejournal.com profile] senji and [livejournal.com profile] p_a_r_a. We drifted over to the community center, which had been transformed into a place for grand feasting (there really was a large amount of both food and booze). There were speeches, and face-paints (which I avoided, thankfully) and lots of cameras (doom), and amusingly violent champagne bottles, and I had a great evening.


Best of all, the happy couple really looked to be enjoying themselves. Congratulations, [livejournal.com profile] fanf and [livejournal.com profile] rmc28!

Shortly, [livejournal.com profile] atreic and I are going down to join people in the Carlton for lunch.
There are 9 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] geekette8.livejournal.com at 02:10pm on 10/07/2005
Whlie I wasn't there, can I just say that even if you had played *appallingly badly* (which I'm sure you didn't) then still, anyone being rude about it is entirely beyond the pale?!

It sounds like a lovely wedding.

 
posted by [identity profile] mtbc100.livejournal.com at 04:21pm on 10/07/2005
Your playing was as a kind favour to friends; you never represented yourself as a professional, and I wonder if those whose comments were adverse didn't realise that? Given the stress you must have been under, my guess is that you did excellently, and I'm sorry I didn't get to hear it.
ext_15802: (Default)
posted by [identity profile] megamole.livejournal.com at 08:22pm on 10/07/2005
Amen to that.
 
posted by [identity profile] arnhem.livejournal.com at 06:45pm on 10/07/2005
Given the conditions you were operating under (particularly re practicing), I thought you played excellently.

FWIW, I really enjoyed your pre-service music and the Purcell.

I think you were not at all helped in the hymns by the fact that there was no "proper" choir; I think this is usual in weddings, and I think it makes the organist's task even more difficult.
ext_15802: (Default)
posted by [identity profile] megamole.livejournal.com at 08:23pm on 10/07/2005
I tried to give a lead - however, standing next to Matthew meant that I was 0.5 sec ahead of people down in the chapel, so it was quite tough.
 
posted by [identity profile] arnhem.livejournal.com at 08:48pm on 10/07/2005
Argh; no criticism was intended ("proper" was, when writing that, a matter of numbers rather than quality, in my mind!). I'd have thought that "quite tough" was understating the challenge a bit.
 
posted by [identity profile] meirion.livejournal.com at 11:37pm on 10/07/2005
i heard you and was following your lead ;-) unfortunately no-one else in the body of the chapel seemed to be :-(

-m-
rmc28: Rachel in hockey gear on the frozen fen at Upware, near Cambridge (Default)
posted by [personal profile] rmc28 at 02:35pm on 21/07/2005
Matthew: who was rude to you? Can I kill them, or at least make certain things clear? *grr*

We wanted *you* to play, and we enjoyed it. It meant a lot that we had a friend playing, not a disinterested professional.

As for the absence of choir, we were out of Term so the Chapel choir wasn't available and would have been quite expensive anyway so I'm not sure we'd have booked them. Thus the music in the service sheets, for the musically competent among the congregation, of whom we knew there would be a lot, and who we hoped would carry things.
 
posted by [identity profile] arnhem.livejournal.com at 03:05pm on 21/07/2005
I don't think I've ever been to a wedding where there was a booked choir.

[ I'm now regretting the use of the phrase "not at all helped" in my reply which sounds critical (of something, not quite sure what!); I think I was trying to convey my sense of "goodness, I'd have been scared to do that", but not using the right words ]

October

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31