...does what it says on the tin. Dimmer switches : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|||
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25 |
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
(no subject)
If you need convincing, think about lights that don't have dimmer switches, and note that they burn out when being switched on much more often than they burn out in use.
Personally, I favour the kind of dimmer that one rotates fully anticlockwise to turn off, for precisely this reason.
As for energy saving, I doubt it makes much difference, except of course that light bulbs themselves cost energy to make, and you'll save some of that if you make them last longer. Arguably you save a little energy if you turn the light on gradually, simply because it's on fully for marginally less time. But then you counteract the saving if you turn it off gradually. (-8
What is inefficient, though, is leaving the lights dimmed. Incandescent bulbs aren't terribly efficient at the best of times, of course, but when dimmed an even greater proportion of the energy they consume is emitted as heat. If you find yourselves always keeping the lights dimmed, change to lower-wattage bulbs.
(no subject)
I think this is a bogus argument. Lights burn out on startup because of the inrush current for a cold lightbulb. Unless you can show that a dimmer switch on maximum dim limits the current sufficiently to keep the inrush current from taking out the weak spot in the filament, you haven't proved that you get any fewer bulb-blows-at-switchon incidents with the start-dim strategy. (And the Internet Light Bulb Book reckons that even if you do keep the weak spot from blowing now, it's still weak and you can't prolong its life by very much.)
(no subject)
Yes, if the filament has a weak spot, limiting the stress you put it under will only postpone the bulb blowing. However, always dimming the bulb up instead of switching it on abruptly will help prevent those weak spots developing in the first place.
As has been noted before, it's not a terribly major effect, but it's there. And we were only asked what the effect was, not how significant it was. (-8
(no subject)
Yes, but the key word is 'sufficiently'. Clearly the current goes down, but does it go down enough? Anyway, enough of this pointless pedantry :-)