emperor: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 04:53pm on 26/05/2006 under

In the light of the previous entry (and a certain confusion that maybe I was interested in the ethics of washing up)... Consider the National Lottery. Assume that the machines all function perfectly,and there is no fraud in the system:
[Poll #736634]
There are 25 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
aldabra: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] aldabra at 03:57pm on 26/05/2006
But just because it's fair doesn't mean that it's a good thing.
ext_8103: (Default)
posted by [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com at 03:57pm on 26/05/2006
Err, eh? Do you mean "is the national lottery fair"? Among the players only, or among the player and the operators, or amone everyone in the country, or what?
emperor: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 04:04pm on 26/05/2006
I mean "is the National Lottery fair?". You may interpret that as you wish :)
gerald_duck: (duckling sideon)
posted by [personal profile] gerald_duck at 05:45pm on 26/05/2006
Given that freedom, I clickied "no", because Camelot takes far too great a proportion of the stake, and I'm far from convinced they were awarded the franchise in a transparently fair way.
 
posted by [identity profile] mostlyacat.livejournal.com at 02:34pm on 29/05/2006
Oh I love your icon
 
posted by [identity profile] crazyscot.livejournal.com at 03:57pm on 26/05/2006
Of course the lottery is unfair, it's a tax on people who are bad at maths.
 
posted by [identity profile] arnhem.livejournal.com at 04:15pm on 26/05/2006
That may be; that doesn't mean that someone who is good at maths must necessarily conclude that it's a silly thing to do.

[ I believe in non-linear utility functions ]
 
posted by [identity profile] claroscuro.livejournal.com at 08:01am on 27/05/2006
It's a tax on hope.

I buy lottery tickets, erratically, and I do so, not because it's a good idea, but because were the one in a trillion (not a real number) to happen, the result would be so good. And because over the course of my life, the money I'd save by not playing is not significant.
 
posted by [identity profile] mattp.livejournal.com at 10:11am on 27/05/2006
That's pretty much my take on it. I average something like one every 4-6 months - perhaps less.
 
posted by [identity profile] the-lady-lily.livejournal.com at 04:05pm on 26/05/2006
I think fairness in terms of the National Lottery is a bit different as it is an instance of gambling, whereas washing up is a social interaction. Hence no opinion on if the NL is fair (mainly because I'm not entirely certain if I think engaging in risk of one's own free choice is fair or not, although probably not) but one on the washing up. I don't think you can neatly separate number theory from the social surroundings ;)
 
posted by [identity profile] ashfae.livejournal.com at 04:19pm on 26/05/2006
Agreed.
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
posted by [personal profile] simont at 04:08pm on 26/05/2006
I think that for these purposes I wish to interpret "fair" in a sense similar to the one I use as an editorial policy for my puzzle collection: a one-player game is fair if there is at all times a non-losing move which can be determined reliably from the information available at the time.

For the Lottery, that move is not to play, and it's the easiest thing in the world. Case closed.
 
posted by [identity profile] arnhem.livejournal.com at 04:18pm on 26/05/2006
In the absence of coercion, and in the presence of reasonably accurate information, it would be fair; I'm not sure that the existing arrangement, with manipulative advertising, mass hysteria, and misleading reporting, quite fits that definition.
 
posted by [identity profile] the-alchemist.livejournal.com at 04:22pm on 26/05/2006
I have a problem with the concept of 'fairness'. I'm not convinced it exists, and I'm not convinced it's desirable.
 
posted by [identity profile] arnhem.livejournal.com at 05:30pm on 26/05/2006
I think it exists, but is not useful as each person's measure of it has an often substantially different basis.
ext_27570: Richard in tricorn hat (Default)
posted by [identity profile] sigisgrim.livejournal.com at 04:52pm on 26/05/2006
Yes, the NL is fair because one easy choice to make is not to play.

So far I am up on everybody I know, regarding the NL, except one; I have never bought a ticket and the person mentioned had one very sizable winnings.

Then again I have been party to a payout from the Awards For All part of the Lottery Fund. Well sort of, the TS received a grant to help pay for the Tolkien Weekend one year.
ext_20923: (emperor)
posted by [identity profile] pellegrina.livejournal.com at 05:05pm on 26/05/2006
I've never bought a NL ticket either!
 
posted by [identity profile] uisgebeatha.livejournal.com at 05:06pm on 26/05/2006
I suppose so. Doesn't make it a good thing, mind you. I rarely play, and I've only won £10 so far. It's all just a big media hype-fest, really. :P
 
posted by [identity profile] senji.livejournal.com at 05:12pm on 26/05/2006
Same comment as before.
 
posted by [identity profile] naath.livejournal.com at 05:50pm on 26/05/2006
It is a 'fair' game in that the rules are clearly stated and obeyed and you can chose not to play.

In is not however fair because the winnings in no way resemble the odds you are playing against and the house takes a ludicrous cut.
 
posted by [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com at 08:05pm on 26/05/2006
I didn't vote in response to the last one, having just found both the polls at once. But I think there must be factors to be taken into account, mustn't there? Randomness is rarely fair...
 
posted by [identity profile] randomchris.livejournal.com at 10:11pm on 26/05/2006
Participating in the National Lottery is a choice. In the previous situation, entering the lot to do the washing-up is not a choice...

The National Lottery is fair, in the sense that everyone who plays has the same chance per pound of winning something (expected 50% return).
 
posted by [identity profile] dagonet.livejournal.com at 02:23am on 27/05/2006
fair. you pays your monies and you takes your chances.

dagonet
 
posted by [identity profile] mattp.livejournal.com at 10:09am on 27/05/2006
Whoah. Small world, stranger :-)
 
posted by (anonymous) at 08:25pm on 27/05/2006
not so small- remember the coventry connection.

dagonet

October

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31