(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] pjc50.livejournal.com at 03:37pm on 20/12/2006
Is supporting a letting agency's sharp business practices out of your own wallet really the morally right thing here?
[parent entry] [link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] ex-lark-asc.livejournal.com at 04:35pm on 20/12/2006
Quite apart from which, there's a hell of a lot of value in being certain that your "moral" system supports what will keep you sane. Not all moral systems are designed with modern culture in mind, let alone the specific and often unusual needs of particular individuals or families; it's best by far to be flexible and willing to question your "morality". Which is the major reason I object to the use of the term "morality" in the first place.
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] firinel.livejournal.com at 06:53pm on 20/12/2006
That really has nothing at all to do with my point, and bears no relation to not only what I said, but also what I think.
[link] [parent] [reply]

October

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1
 
 2
 
 3
 
 4
 
5
 
 6
 
 7
 
 8
 
 9
 
 10
 
 11
 
12
 
 13
 
 14
 
 15
 
 16
 
 17
 
 18
 
19
 
 20
 
 21
 
 22
 
 23
 
 24
 
 25
1
26
 
 27
 
 28
 
 29
 
 30
 
 31