emperor: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 05:56pm on 03/11/2008
I'm currently awaiting a couple of packages. When I got home today, I had a card (no name, just our address) from "Rapid Forwarding UK", saying:
Rapid Forwarding UK.


There is an item to forward
please call to make arrangements

Lo-call: 0845 603 1406
Note all calls are charged at normal local rates

Please contct us a.s.a.p. / call anytime

Quoting Job No: [elided]

Company Reg. No. 3983694 - Registered Office: 3 Leodis Court, Leeds, LS11 5JJ
Calls may be recorded for training and security purposes


This struck me as a bit odd, so I googled, and got hints that they were a front for a debt collectors, the idea being that if you call and give them the reference, then they know that you live there.

Companies house confirms the name and registered office, but thinks they are a "6024 - Freight transport by road" company (are you, I wonder, allowed to lie about this?), so I asked 192.com to look up businesses in LS11 5JJ. That offered me 1st Locate Limited, at 3 Leodis Court (amongst others in the same postcode), and http://www.voifirst.co.uk/contacts.html which is an odd page (I don't have flash here). Amongst other things, it links to http://www.1stlocate.com/ who are, as expected, a debt recovery company specialising in utilities.

So, presumably, they (like several other firms) are after the previous tenant. They are also dishonest.

I should probably just throw the postcard away, but I'm tempted to phone them up and shout at them for lying to me. I'm not sure if that would achieve anything other than letting me blow off a bit of steam, though. I could tell them that I have a forwarding address for the previous resident which I'd have given them if they'd been honest... ;-)

ETA it's worse than that. This lot of cowboys are the same as LCS Civil Enforcement, who have sent us 3 letters asking about our details, and the previous tenants' details in relation to utility bills. We've spoken to them after each letter; and after the last one they promised not to send any more letters! I am even less impressed! This sort of thing shouldn't be legal; I'm fed up of being bothered by them.

ETA2 www.ukdata.com lists them as non-trading...
Mood:: 'pissed off' pissed off
There are 16 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] illusive-shelle.livejournal.com at 06:09pm on 03/11/2008
141 on your call, or use a public telephone box? Then you get the satisfaction of yelling at them without the downside of them stalking you unless you confirm the address with them.
aldabra: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] aldabra at 06:10pm on 03/11/2008
I shouldn't tell them anything at all which would encourage them (you don't want them turning up to encourage you to divulge the redirection address).

You could phone them up and say "Is it a parcel for Joe Bloggs?" without *actually* saying you're not Joe Bloggs, and see how much of their time you can waste. And if they say no it isn't you could phone again and ask if it's one of the parcels for you.
 
posted by [identity profile] mhoulden.livejournal.com at 06:18pm on 03/11/2008
Not very far from the centre of town for me. I'm tempted to call in and get a quote for sending something.
gerald_duck: (devil duck)
posted by [personal profile] gerald_duck at 06:19pm on 03/11/2008
They're trying to trick you into paying for a phone call under false pretences. Set OFCOM on them?
 
posted by [identity profile] ex-robhu.livejournal.com at 06:26pm on 03/11/2008
I imagine you're going to give them a damn good kicking.
 
posted by [identity profile] sesquipedality.livejournal.com at 06:39pm on 03/11/2008
These guys are in breach of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/cpregs/oft1008.pdf

See in particular:
Provisions 21 and 22 (page 25)
Chaper 7 (Misleading Practices)

Misleading Practices are a criminal offence. Trading Standards in the area of the firm is your first port of call.

Hope this helps.
 
posted by [identity profile] deliberateblank.livejournal.com at 07:51pm on 03/11/2008
I'm not convinced - they are not at this point trying to sell anything, but to enforce a pre-existing contractual obligation (albeit not with M), for which the rules are different.

The OFT does have some guidelines on unfair practices of debt collectors:

http://www.oft.gov.uk/advice_and_resources/resource_base/legal/cca/debt-collection
http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

Which this would seem to fall foul of. 2.2.(c), 2.4.(f), 2.7, 2.8.(a,j,k) frex. Well, the terminology may be a bit loose but I think there's an argument that they've breached *something* in there. Note also that the pdf states that those who hire third parties are liable to sanction themselves for breaches committed by those third parties. Investigating the OFT complaints procedure may be a useful next step.
 
posted by [identity profile] mhoulden.livejournal.com at 11:05pm on 03/11/2008
There's also section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 which is pretty explicit. You can contact West Yorks Trading Standards via http://www.ts.wyjs.org.uk/index.asp?pg=Indexhome.htm.

I've got the Leeds telephone directories here and neither Rapid Forwarding or 1st Locate are in them.
 
posted by [identity profile] sesquipedality.livejournal.com at 11:53pm on 03/11/2008
The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations cover businesses whose activities have an effect on consumers. If you look at some of the flow charts in the above document, it appears pretty clear that a customer relationship is not necessary for the regulations to apply. It is enough for a trader to engage in measures that negatively impact consumers, that is members of the public acting in a private capacity.

Of course, the debt collection guidelines also apply, but it's a lot easier to nab them for a clear breach of criminal law than a breach of guildelines. On the other hand, the Regulations don't have a body of case law built up around them yet, but if anything that makes them a slightly scarier stick with which to beat asshole debt collectors with, and indeed I use them to this purpose in my professional life.
emperor: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 10:21am on 04/11/2008
Thanks; I'll drop TS a line.
 
posted by [identity profile] mhoulden.livejournal.com at 11:19am on 04/11/2008
If you really want to wind them up, contact the local paper. The Yorkshire Evening Post has a contact us page at http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/contactus.aspx. TS can prosecute but being exposed in the press should really put a stop to it.
 
posted by [identity profile] sesquipedality.livejournal.com at 08:50am on 05/11/2008
No problem. There's a reason I went into this line of work. :)
 
posted by [identity profile] saraphale.livejournal.com at 09:53pm on 03/11/2008
FWIW, the universal advice we got after the fact, when a bailif turned up at our house, was "If he didn't show you a court order, he shouldn't have been there." This was not just from the CAB, but also from the magistrate whose court we eventually ended up in.
 
posted by [identity profile] wellinghall.livejournal.com at 08:29am on 04/11/2008
I have had similar (although not identical) dealings with a debt collection agency. I wish you luck.
 
posted by [identity profile] ex-robhu.livejournal.com at 12:41pm on 04/11/2008
Presumably you have seen: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7707727.stm
emperor: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 12:42pm on 04/11/2008
Yes, thank you.

October

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31