emperor: (Phoenix)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 04:12pm on 28/06/2014 under , ,
I have (probably) done all the reading I'm going to do for this category, and propose to vote thus:

1) Ancillary Justice [excellent book, I loved this]
2) Neptune's Brood [good fun, compelling story, interesting economics]
3) Parasite [enjoyable, but terribly predictable]
4) No Award
The Wheel of Time
Warbound [I got 11% of the way through. Terrible.]


Ancillary Justice reminds me somewhat of Iain M. Banks, though without quite the large-scale space battles. I really enjoy this ~human protagonist in a world of high tech and strong AI style, and the plot is twisty and interesting, and the politics engaging. I loved this book so much that I immediately bought it for my Dad. Really, read it.

Neptune's Brood was good, but not excellent. The protagonist is a specialist in faster-than-light-travel scams in a universe where the economy has evolved to transmit debt across vast distance, and it rapidly becomes clear that someone wants them to stop what they're investigating. This has some lovely parts (communist squid, goth spaceship morgue-cum-chapel, an interlude on the effects of vast pressure on a body), though I wonder if was originally serialised, as some points get repeated often enough for it to grate at times.

I saw through the main plot point of Parasite within about the first two chapters; so while I kept reading because it was engaging, I felt it lacked a bit of narrative tension. It's the first of a trilogy, and has set up an interesting premise, so perhaps the next two books will be better.

Warbound was awful. You know how you sometimes go to the cinema to see a stupid blockbuster? Where the White American Dude will save the world, get the girl, and shoot a bunch of baddies? Where there will be only about 2 characters, no moral nuance, and a pile of prolematic imagery? But you switch your brain off for a couple of hours and watch the crazy stunts and massive explosions, and that's quite good fun? This book was like that, but without any of the fun bits, and the prose was dreadfully pedestrian. I got about 11% of the way through before giving up.

I'm not going to have time to read the entire Wheel of Time before the voting deadline, so I've moved on to the novellas. I think voters should have a chance to read/watch a work before voting on it, so I don't think a 13-large-book epic is really fair to nominate. If I have time, I may read the first book, and if I love it I might reconsider not voting for it, but really I'd have rather the first book had been nominated when it came out.
There are 6 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
rmc28: Rachel in hockey gear on the frozen fen at Upware, near Cambridge (Default)
posted by [personal profile] rmc28 at 05:54pm on 28/06/2014
Snap.

Yay Ancillary Justice.
 
posted by [identity profile] makyo.livejournal.com at 09:22pm on 28/06/2014
This is pretty much my provisional line-up so far, except that at the moment I've got The Wheel of Time above No Award. I've read the samples of Ancillary Justice (which I really enjoyed, have ordered a copy of the full book, and also found slightly reminiscent of Banks' Culture novels) and Neptune's Brood (which I also enjoyed, and now have a copy of the full book). I haven't got around to Parasite yet, but it sounds decent enough from what I've heard.

I loaded The Wheel of Time onto my ebook reader, tapped the cover icon, thought "good lord, it's over ten thousand pages", and resolved to skim-read some of the first volume to get an idea of what it's like.

I was at Eastercon when the nominations were announced, and initially assumed Warbound: Book 3 of the Grimnoir Chronicles was a spoof akin to John Scalzi's Shadow War of the Night Dragons - Book 1: The Dead City - Prologue (an entertaining April Fool joke that got nominated in the short story category a couple of years ago). Then it turned out it's (a) a real thing (Grimnoir Chronicles? Really?) and (b) the guy who wrote it is politically some considerable distance to the right of me, and (c) it got on the ballot by gaming the nomination process. Which latter I thought was bad form. (Another friend remarked a couple of weeks ago that No Award has already bought a posh dress for the awards ceremony.) You're not the first person I know to comment adversely on its quality.
 
posted by [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com at 06:45am on 29/06/2014
I've decided I'm not going to read Parasite, as everyone who's opinions I trust has said 'it's like Feed, but not quite as good' I really enjoyed Feed, but by the end of the trilogy had had enough of it, so I think I'm going to short cut my opinions on that one
 
posted by [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com at 06:52am on 29/06/2014
When I first heard about (c), I agreed with you, and thought 'gosh, that's terrible, what an arse'. Although I think it's interesting, drawing a line between an author encouraging their fans and saying 'hey, it's the hugos, I'd really really love to win one, have you noticed this book of mine is eligeable' (which probably isn't bad at all?) and an author going 'hey, it's the hugos, I'd really love to be nominated to make a political point' (which I clearly feel is bad, in a 'don't storm into the playground and mess up people's fun with your politics' way, but is very similar behaviour)

I think anyone who wants an opinion should read Corriea's blog post (I mean, I don't think it's a spoof, although I haven't really checked) which I found mostly interesting , well written, and articulate. http://monsterhunternation.com/2014/04/24/an-explanation-about-the-hugo-awards-controversy/
ext_8103: (penguin)
posted by [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com at 09:00am on 29/06/2014
I gave up when I reached the conspiracy-theorizing about the publishing industry and SJWs, although I'd already started to wonder about his connection to reality when he concluded that he'd proved that the nomination process was biased against him despite the fact of his book's nomination. (Not to deny that some people objected; just apparently not enough people to affect the outcome. Comparing with systematic discrimination in other fields, it's a pretty rubbish kind of supposed oppression that crumbles the moment someone pushes against it a little.)

I've not read the book yet, nor WoT, in both cases because the time commitment required to do a proper job is so much more than the other nominees. (I've read the other controversial one, my opinions can be be in my LJ.)
 
posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 03:01pm on 01/07/2014
... let alone "Look, it's the Hugos, please nominate me and 10 other people who I have picked purely on the basis of their political views. PS: one of them's political views would make Nick Griffin blanch."

October

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31