emperor: (Phoenix)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 11:46pm on 02/07/2014 under , ,
I've read all of these, and propose to vote thus:

1) The Chaplain's Legacy (Brad Torgersen) [not as clever as some, but the most affecting]
2) Six-Gun Snow White (Catherynne M. Valente) [beautifully-crafted re-telling, but didn't draw me in]
3) Equoid (Charles Stross) [clever, silly, entertaining]
4) No Award
Wakulla Springs (Andy Duncan and Ellen Klages) [interesting, but not SF]
The Butcher of Khardov (Dan Wells) [Poor]

I wasn't as sure in my ordered with these as I was with the novels.

The Chaplain's Legacy is about a chaplain's assistant who once saved humanity by persuading an alien professor that religion was interesting (the aliens are atheist, and completely bemused by the idea of faith); the aliens have now decided that religion has ceased to be interesting enough to justify letting humanity live. So the chaplain's assistant is brought in again to try and get a stay of execution, but then it all goes south. Two humans and two mantes (including the Queen Mother, evicted from her technological disk) are marooned on an empty planet, left to walk in search of shelter and rescue. The plot has a couple of twists (though nothing particularly off-piste), but I found the chaplain dealing with everyone's expectations of his ministry and how those contrast with his own lack of faith very moving. I suspect it won't appeal to less religiously-minded folk as much.

Six-Gun Snow White is a re-telling of the fairy tale, as you might expect. It's set in the early USA, and there's a fair dose of magical realism. This is a beautifully-crafted novella, which I think would reward re-reading. It's certainly technically better than the Torgersen, but somehow it didn't move me; I didn't find myself really caring about the protagonist. Maybe I'll read it again before the voting deadline, and might move it up a place.

Equoid is a Laundry book; I've only read one other of these, but the basic premise is that there's a government department that's responsible for handling the paranormal. In this case, it's My Little Pony meets Cthulhu. The result is great fun, tightly paced, and very silly. I found the Lovecraft-purple-prose bits a little too tedious in places, but this is a minor quibble.

Wakulla Springs is set in the obvious place; it tells a tale of generations of people of colour, and their interactions with the film industry who used the springs as a location to film in. It's an interesting, politically charged story that's well worth reading, but I can't quite bring myself to vote for it in an SF award, as I don't think it's SF.

The Butcher of Khardov is wargame fan-fiction: Warmachine is a wargame based on an RPG setting, and The Butcher of Khardov is about a Warcaster, the key character type in the game: able to control war machines by magic, and also adept strategists and spell-casters. The titular character is a warcaster (and, I gather, a powerful playing piece in the game), and this book describes some events in his life. I guess if you're a fan of the game, this backstory for a significant character might be interesting, but I didn't like it, and it's a bit too "man goes mad because he cannot protect his women".
There are 9 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 10:42am on 03/07/2014
I dunno how petty you are (I am) but Torgersen was ballot-stuffed.
 
posted by [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com at 09:30am on 04/07/2014
And from what I could tell, didn't orchestrate it, but neither distanced himself from it.
 
posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 05:22pm on 08/07/2014
I think Weisskopf, being a perfectly nice sensible editor, is the only one where I really care about possible collateral damage there.
 
posted by [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com at 10:45am on 03/07/2014
Also, what, Wells is writing what is basically fanfic for a game that's basically 40k fanfic?
emperor: (Phoenix)
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 04:39pm on 03/07/2014
More derivative than an article on the housing market...
 
posted by [identity profile] mike taylor at 12:39am on 04/07/2014
It seems beyond petty to say that a story is "well-worth reading" and then rank it below No Award.

Wakulla Springs qualified for the ballot. It is a compelling story, well-written, and unique.

If it doesn't fit your narrow definition of what is -- or isn't -- science fiction, then by all means, don't vote it #1. But IMHO, you dishonor the Hugos by saying that no award at all is preferable to a even recognizing a very good story.
 
posted by [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com at 09:28am on 04/07/2014
Hm. I have a fairly broad definition of science fiction -- eg. I'm happy to include science-based or science-fiction based stories that are not speculative, or other stories which are likely to appeal to science fiction readers. I've not read WS yet, so I don't know if I'd count it, though I think I probably would.

But I also think it's logical that _if_ a story falls outside your definition of SFF, you don't want it to get the hugo award. There's no point to the hugo award if it's just "the best books in any genre".
emperor: (Phoenix)
posted by [personal profile] emperor at 12:40pm on 04/07/2014
Thanks for your contribution, but I'm going to disagree.

I don't think that as a voter I'm obliged to do anything other than voting for what I think should win; there's no specified criteria I'm supposed to judge a work against. Indeed, the only guideline is that the award is for SF and Fantasy works.

So, I think I'm entitled to say both "I'm voting The Chaplain's Legacy above SGSW, even though the latter is more technically accomplished, because the former was more emotionally involving", and "I won't vote for Wakulla Springs even though it's a good story because I think it shouldn't win an award for SF/Fantasy".

As a side point, I've been trying to avoid hearing about which works have been "ballot-stuffed", because I want to judge the works on their merits. But I think people who hold that "ballot-stuffed entries shouldn't win" are entitled to that opinion, and to vote accordingly.
Edited Date: 2014-07-04 12:41 pm (UTC)
 
posted by [identity profile] ceb.livejournal.com at 12:58pm on 04/07/2014
SF/Fantasy

I feel obliged to say "/horror" here :-)

I really liked Wakulla Springs but the actual SFnal content was tiny and felt awkwardly shoe-horned in. OTOH I'd be very happy to call it "related". My current inclination is to put it above No Award but only just (NB I am putting ballot-stuffers below No Award), so that leaves Wakulla Springs as 3rd). I may go higher though, I'm not sure.
Edited Date: 2014-07-04 12:59 pm (UTC)

October

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31